ABSTRACT
Background@#The enteric reconstruction procedure of pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains to be the critical factor influencing the mortality and morbidity. No widely accepted surgical procedure for the pancreaticojejunostomy has been erected yet. We have developed a new technique of pancreaticojejunostomy named "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy."@*Methods@#This is a prospective single-arm observational study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." Patients with diseases, in whom a pancreaticoduodenectomy is indicated, would be recruited from Peking University Third Hospital. The hypothesis to be tested is that a "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy" will reduce fistula rate from around 20% to less than 10%. A sample size of 120 patients will be needed. The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The secondary endpoints of the study are anastomosis time, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidities besides the POPF such as the hemorrhage. Enrolled patients will undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy and be followed up for 3 months. The relevant data will be monitored and recorded.@*Conclusions@#The current trial will explore the therapeutic value of the newly raised pancreaticojejunostomy procedure as the "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." Its theoretical base and pragmatic feature will promise high external validity.@*Trial registration@#Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03366038; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND@#The enteric reconstruction procedure of pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains to be the critical factor influencing the mortality and morbidity. No widely accepted surgical procedure for the pancreaticojejunostomy has been erected yet. We have developed a new technique of pancreaticojejunostomy named "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy."@*METHODS@#This is a prospective single-arm observational study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." Patients with diseases, in whom a pancreaticoduodenectomy is indicated, would be recruited from Peking University Third Hospital. The hypothesis to be tested is that a "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy" will reduce fistula rate from around 20% to less than 10%. A sample size of 120 patients will be needed. The primary endpoint is the incidence rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The secondary endpoints of the study are anastomosis time, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidities besides the POPF such as the hemorrhage. Enrolled patients will undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy and be followed up for 3 months. The relevant data will be monitored and recorded.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The current trial will explore the therapeutic value of the newly raised pancreaticojejunostomy procedure as the "shark mouth pancreaticojejunostomy." Its theoretical base and pragmatic feature will promise high external validity.@*TRIAL REGISTRATION@#Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03366038; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Conflicting results about the association between expression level of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) and clinical outcome in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving chemotherapy have been reported. Thus, we searched the available articles and performed the meta-analysis to elucidate the prognostic role of ERCC1 expression in patients with CRC.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A thorough literature search using PubMed (Medline), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, and Chinese Science Citation Database was conducted to obtain the relevant studies. Pooled hazard ratios (HR s) or odds ratios (OR s) with 95% confidence intervals (CI s) were calculated to estimate the results.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 11 studies were finally enrolled in this meta-analysis. Compared with patients with lower ERCC1 expression, patients with higher ERCC1 expression tended to have unfavorable overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.325, 95% CI: 1.720-3.143, P < 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.917, 95% CI: 1.366-2.691, P < 0.001) and poor response to chemotherapy (OR = 0.491, 95% CI: 0.243-0.990, P = 0.047). Subgroup analyses by treatment setting, ethnicity, HR extraction, detection methods, survival analysis, and study design demonstrated that our results were robust.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>ERCC1 expression may be taken as an effective prognostic factor predicting the response to chemotherapy, OS, and PFS. Further studies with better study design and longer follow-up are warranted in order to gain a deeper understanding of ERCC1's prognostic value.</p>